Which command relationship places units or personnel in an organization where such placement is relatively permanent, and where the organization controls and administers the units or personnel for the primary function?

Which command relationship places units or personnel in an organization where such placement is relatively permanent, and where the organization controls and administers the units or personnel for the primary function?

• A. Organic
• B. Tactical Control
• C. Assigned
• D. Attached

Answer: (C)

The idea being tested is administrative control and long-term placement of units within a parent organization. When a unit is assigned to another organization, that parent organization is responsible for the unit’s administration, personnel, logistics, and its primary function. This setup is relatively permanent and centers on who administers and manages the unit on an ongoing basis. This differs from an attached relationship, which is temporary and task-specific; organic means the unit is an integral, inherent part of the organization; and tactical control is about directing the unit’s actions for a particular mission without implying long-term administrative responsibility. Therefore, the described arrangement best fits an assigned relationship.

The idea being tested is administrative control and long-term placement of units within a parent organization. When a unit is assigned to another organization, that parent organization is responsible for the unit’s administration, personnel, logistics, and its primary function. This setup is relatively permanent and centers on who administers and manages the unit on an ongoing basis.

This differs from an attached relationship, which is temporary and task-specific; organic means the unit is an integral, inherent part of the organization; and tactical control is about directing the unit’s actions for a particular mission without implying long-term administrative responsibility. Therefore, the described arrangement best fits an assigned relationship.